We want to understand who uses workforce data and why? Please fill in this survey. opens in a new window
Add a school or college to start your comparison list
MAT (multi-academy trust) performance measures are intended to give an indication of how well MATs are currently performing. This page shows revised opens a popup results data for pupils who completed key stage 2 opens a popup in the summer of 2017. These figures were published in January 2017.
See Multi-academy trust performance measures for full details of how we calculate MAT measures.
MAT progress scores in reading, writing and maths
Types of school
Total schools: 15
|Converter academies||Sponsored academies||Other|
|Types of school||4||11||0|
Years in MAT
|1 year||2 years||3 years||4 years||5+ years|
|Years in MAT||0||0||4||10||1|
Key stage 1 average point score on entry
|Key stage 1 average point score on entry||14.9||15.8|
% disadvantaged pupils
|% disadvantaged pupils||50.9%||32%|
% SEN pupils with statement or EHC plan and SEN support
|% SEN pupils with statement or EHC plan and SEN support||2.4%||3%|
% English as an additional language pupils
|% English as an additional language pupils||58.2%||20%|
These scores show how much progress pupils at this school made in reading, writing and maths between the end of key stage 1 and the end of key stage 2, compared to pupils across England who got similar results at the end of key stage 1.
The scores are calculated by comparing the key stage 2 test and assessment results of pupils at this school with the results of pupils in schools across England who started with similar assessment results at the end of the previous key stage – key stage 1.
A score above zero means pupils made more progress, on average, than pupils across England who got similar results at the end of key stage 1.
A score below zero means pupils made less progress, on average, than pupils across England who got similar results at the end of key stage 1.
A negative progress score does not mean pupils have made no progress, or the school has failed, rather it means pupils in the school made less progress than other pupils across England with similar results at the end of key stage 1.
The majority of schools have progress scores between -5 and +5.
See School performance tables: about the data for more information about how the progress measures are calculated.
Evidence shows that, overall, performance of disadvantaged pupils is lower than that of other pupils. This data indicates how well a school does at tackling this difference. Disadvantaged pupils are those who were eligible for free school meals at any time during the last 6 years and children looked after (in the care of the local authority for a day or more or who have been adopted from care).
|MAT disadvantaged pupils||England state-funded schools other (non-disadvantaged) pupils|
|MAT reading progress score and confidence intervals||
(-1.7 to -0.4)
(0.0 to 0.0)
|MAT writing progress score and confidence intervals||
(-0.4 to 0.9)
(0.0 to 0.0)
|MAT maths progress score and confidence intervals||
(-1.3 to 0)
(0.0 to 0.0)
Schools covering key stage 2 included in this MAT’s performance data
Number of schools covering key stage 2 included in 2017 MAT performance measures: 15
Number of key stage 2 pupils included in 2017 MAT performance measures: 761
Schools covering key stage 2 in this MAT
- Billesley Primary School
- Croft Academy
- George Betts Primary Academy
- Highlees Primary School
- Hillingdon Primary School
- Kings Rise Academy
- Lena Gardens Primary School
- Parkfield Primary School
- Pinkwell Primary School
- Ramnoth Junior School
- Shireland Hall Primary Academy
- The Hyde School
- The Shirestone Academy
- Tiverton Academy
- Woods Bank Academy
In the 2017 results, schools are counted under the MAT / sponsor they were part of as of 12 September 2016, as long as they had been with that MAT / sponsor since 12 September 2014. To view all schools currently under the MAT / sponsor visit the THE ELLIOT FOUNDATION ACADEMIES TRUST school table.
Is there anything wrong with this page? Click to expand
Help us improve GOV.UK
Thank you for your help
If you have more extensive feedback, please complete our survey opens in a new window
An error occurred while processing your feedback submission
Please try again