Now published: 16-18 remaining measures, 2017 absence data and time series data.
See publication timetable for full details. We no longer grant 24 hour pre-release access to media organisations opens in a new window.
Hide message

Add a school or college to start your comparison list

THE DAVID ROSS EDUCATION TRUST

About these results Click to expand

MAT (multi-academy trust) performance measures are intended to give an indication of how well MATs are currently performing. This page shows revised opens a popup results data for pupils who completed key stage 2 opens a popup in the summer of 2017. These figures were published in January 2017.

See Multi-academy trust performance measures for full details of how we calculate MAT measures.

Types of school Open help text for Types of school opens a popup

Total schools: 18

View as table
Converter academies Other
Types of school 5 13 0

Years in MAT Open help text for Years in MAT opens a popup

View as table
1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5+ years
Years in MAT 0 0 9 7 2

Key stage 1 average point score on entry Open help text for Key stage 1 average point score on entry opens a popup

View as table
Trust England average
Key stage 1 average point score on entry 15.2 15.8

% disadvantaged pupils Open help text for Disadvantaged pupils opens a popup

View as table
Trust England average
% disadvantaged pupils 39.6% 32%

% SEN pupils with statement or EHC plan and SEN support Open help text for % SEN with EHC plan and SEN support opens a popup

View as table
Trust England average
% SEN pupils with statement or EHC plan and SEN support 1.4% 3%

% English as an additional language pupils Open help text for English as an additional language (EAL) opens a popup

View as table
Trust England average
% English as an additional language pupils 17% 20%

Additional measure

Progress of disadvantaged pupils Click to expand

These scores show how much progress pupils at this school made in reading, writing and maths between the end of key stage 1 and the end of key stage 2, compared to pupils across England who got similar results at the end of key stage 1.

The scores are calculated by comparing the key stage 2 test and assessment results of pupils at this school with the results of pupils in schools across England who started with similar assessment results at the end of the previous key stage – key stage 1.

A score above zero means pupils made more progress, on average, than pupils across England who got similar results at the end of key stage 1.

A score below zero means pupils made less progress, on average, than pupils across England who got similar results at the end of key stage 1.

A negative progress score does not mean pupils have made no progress, or the school has failed, rather it means pupils in the school made less progress than other pupils across England with similar results at the end of key stage 1.

The majority of schools have progress scores between -5 and +5.

See School performance tables: about the data for more information about how the progress measures are calculated.

Evidence shows that, overall, performance of disadvantaged pupils is lower than that of other pupils. This data indicates how well a school does at tackling this difference. Disadvantaged pupils are those who were eligible for free school meals at any time during the last 6 years and children looked after (in the care of the local authority for a day or more or who have been adopted from care).

MAT disadvantaged pupils England state-funded schools other (non-disadvantaged) pupils
MAT reading progress score and confidence intervals -2
(-2.8 to -1.2)
0.3
(0.0 to 0.0)
MAT writing progress score and confidence intervals -1.2
(-1.9 to -0.4)
0.2
(0.0 to 0.0)
MAT maths progress score and confidence intervals -1.8
(-2.5 to -1.1)
0.3
(0.0 to 0.0)

Schools covering key stage 2 in this MAT

Number of schools covering key stage 2 included in 2017 MAT performance measures: 18 Open help text for Schools included in MAT (multi-academy trust) measures opens a popup

Number of key stage 2 pupils included in 2017 MAT performance measures: 712

Schools covering key stage 2 in this MAT Included in 2017 MAT performance measures
Abbey CofE Academy tick
Ainthorpe Primary School tick
Bobby Moore Academy cross
Briar Hill Primary School tick
Bringhurst Primary School tick
Cedar Road Primary School tick
Eastfield Academy tick
Edward Heneage Primary Academy tick
Endike Academy tick
Fairfield Primary School cross
Falconer's Hill Academy tick
Greenfields Primary School tick
Hogsthorpe Primary Academy tick
Ingoldsby Academy cross
Kings Heath Primary Academy tick
Malcolm Arnold Preparatory School cross
Newnham Primary School tick
Quay Academy cross
Rockingham Primary School tick
The Arbours Primary Academy tick
The Eresby School, Spilsby cross
Thomas Hinderwell Primary Academy tick
Welton Church of England Academy tick
Wold Academy tick
About these results Click to expand

MAT (multi-academy trust) performance measures are intended to give an indication of how well MATs are currently performing. This page shows revised opens a popup results data for pupils who completed key stage 4 opens a popup in the summer of 2017. These figures were published in January 2017.

See Multi-academy trust performance measures for full details of how we calculate MAT measures.

Years in MAT Open help text for Years in MAT opens a popup

View as table
1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5+ years
Years in MAT 0 0 1 2 5

Key stage 2 average point score on entry Open help text for Key stage 2 average point score on entry opens a popup

View as table
Trust England average
Key stage 2 average point score on entry 27.4 28.3

% disadvantaged pupils Open help text for Disadvantaged pupils (key stage 4) opens a popup

View as table
Trust England average
% disadvantaged pupils 30.2% 27.20%

% SEN with statement or EHC plan and SEN support Open help text for % SEN with EHC plan and SEN support opens a popup

View as table
Trust England average
% SEN pupils with statement or EHC plan and SEN support 1.1% 3.70%

% English as an additional language pupils Open help text for English as an additional language (EAL) opens a popup

View as table
Trust England average
% English as an additional language pupils 15.3% 15.90%

Achieving EBacc at grade 5/C or above Open help text for Achieving EBacc at grade 5/C or above opens a popup

View as table
Trust England average
Achieving EBacc at grade 5/C or above 18.7% 21.30%

Entering EBacc Open help text for Entering EBacc opens a popup

View as table
Trust England average
Entering EBacc 37.9% 38.20%

Achieving EBacc at grade 4/C or above Open help text for Achieving EBacc at grade 4/C or above opens a popup

View as table
Trust England average
Achieving EBacc at grade 4/C or above 21.2% 23.80%

Additional measures

Disadvantaged pupils Click to expand

Disadvantaged pupils are those who attract pupil premium funding, meaning pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care, or who left care through adoption or another formal route.

MAT disadvantaged pupils England state-funded schools other (non-disadvantaged) pupils
Progress 8 multi-academy trust measure score and confidence intervals -0.1
(-0.26 to 0.06)
0.11
(0.1 to 0.11)
Entering EBacc
more info Click to expand

A pupil is considered to have entered for the English Baccalaureate if they entered for qualifications in English, maths, sciences, a language and either history or geography. The English Baccalaureate (EBacc) is not a test or qualification; it is a measure used to provide information about a particular range of qualifications.

University technical colleges, studio schools and some further education colleges with key stage 4 provision provide a specialist technical and professional education. Our position is that it is not appropriate to expect the same rates of EBacc entry from these types of provision and that each school should decide on a case-by-case basis whether its specialist curriculum is compatible with the full EBacc.

18.1% 43.00%
Achieving EBacc at grade 5/C or above
more info Click to expand

This is the percentage of pupils who achieved the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) at a grade 5 or above in English and maths, and at a grade C or above in the following subject areas: sciences, a language, and either history or geography. The English Baccalaureate is not a test or qualification; it is a measure used to provide information about a particular range of qualifications. The grading of English and maths GCSEs changed in the 2017 GCSEs reforms. Reformed GCSEs are graded 1 (low) to 9 (high). Grade 5 in the new grading is a similar level of achievement to a high grade C or low grade B in the old grading.

6.4% 25.60%
Achieving EBacc at grade 4/C or above
more info Click to expand

This is the percentage of pupils who achieved the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) at a grade 4 or above in English and maths, and at a grade C or above in the following subject areas: sciences, a language, and either history or geography. The English Baccalaureate is not a test or qualification; it is a measure used to provide information about a particular range of qualifications. The grading of English and maths GCSEs changed in the 2017 GCSEs reforms. Reformed GCSEs are graded 1 (low) to 9 (high). Grade 4 or above in the new grading is a similar level of achievement to a grade C or above in the old grading.

7.1% 28.20%

Schools covering key stage 4 in this MAT

Number of schools covering key stage 4 included in 2017 MAT performance measures: 8 Open help text for Schools included in MAT (multi-academy trust) measures opens a popup

Number of key stage 4 pupils included in 2017 MAT performance measures: 882

Schools covering key stage 4 in this MAT Included in 2017 MAT performance measures
Bobby Moore Academy cross
Charles Read Academy tick
Charnwood College cross
Charnwood College (Upper) cross
Havelock Academy tick
Humberston Academy tick
King Edward VI Academy tick
Lodge Park Academy tick
Malcolm Arnold Academy tick
Skegness Grammar School tick
The Barnes Wallis Academy tick
The Eresby School, Spilsby cross
Thomas Middlecott Academy cross
Is there anything wrong with this page? Click to expand